Founder Insight

Why Technical Founders Should Stop Pitching Their Product

Jay Hack, Head of AI at ClickUp

Listen on TL;Listen Prefer to listen? Hear this article read aloud.

There’s a paradox in founder communications that most technical founders never escape: the harder you pitch, the less people believe you. Jay Hack learned this building Codegen, one of the first coding agent companies, and then selling it to ClickUp, the $4B work management platform where he now leads AI.

His advice is disarmingly simple and almost counterintuitive for founders trained to sell: stop pitching your product entirely.

The Desperation Signal

Jay’s claim lands hard because it applies to everything founders spend their time on: fundraising, hiring, and customer acquisition. All three suffer from the same dynamic.

“It sounds ridiculous, but I think it’s actually true,” he says. “In the process of trying to convince people that what you’re doing is a good idea, you end up actually in many ways showing that you’re desperate.”

The pattern is familiar on social media. A founder posts “our thing is the best, here’s why you should use our thing” and lays it on heavy. The audience — engineers, investors, potential hires — can smell it. They’ve seen hundreds of these posts. The pitch doesn’t create conviction. It signals that the product can’t speak for itself.

The Figma Strategy

Jay points to Figma as a company that solved this. Instead of talking about why you should use Figma, they talk about exalting the designer. The designer is the hero. The product is the thing that enables the hero to do their best work.

“Instead of talking about ‘this is why you should use Figma,’ I think Figma talks about exalting the designer. The designer is the winner and the thing that enables the designer to deliver on the role is this futuristic product.”

The structural move is subtle but powerful. You construct a narrative where the listener arrives at the conclusion themselves. You demonstrate mastery of the problem space through insights that are genuinely interesting on their own. And you leave a gap in the story — “a hole in the narrative” — where the natural conclusion is that your product fills it.

How Jay Practices This

He’s transparent about his own approach. When he talks publicly about ClickUp’s AI work, he leads with the thesis, not the product.

“Instead of emphasizing ‘this is why our approach is great,’ I instead emphasize the underlying theses that I have that have led me to the conclusion that this is the winning strategy,” Jay explains.

In practice, this means talking about why integrated information makes agents more effective, why fragmented tools create a tax on productivity, and why Slack’s API restrictions make agents appear stupid. These are independently interesting observations. The listener connects the dots to ClickUp on their own.

“You basically let the person who’s listening to your narrative feel smart by arriving at that conclusion. And what you do is instead of laying out a five-part essay that explains this is what the customer should do, you instead basically say interesting things that demonstrate a mastery of the topic.”

Why This Works on Exactly the People You Want

The approach has a built-in filter. People who want to be sold to — who are looking for someone to tell them what to buy — are often the wrong audience. High-value customers, strong employees, and serious investors make their own decisions.

“People don’t want to be sold to,” Jay says. “And if somebody wants to be sold to, then it’s kind of a red flag that maybe they’re not the right person you should be talking to, especially as you think about employees, venture capitalists, potential customers who could be high value for you.”

The quiet confidence approach attracts people who are doing their own research, forming their own views, and looking for evidence that a team deeply understands their domain. Those are the customers who stick, the employees who contribute, and the investors who add value beyond capital.

FAQ

Why shouldn’t founders pitch their product directly?

Direct pitching signals desperation and triggers skepticism in technical audiences. Jay Hack found that demonstrating mastery of the problem space — sharing insights that are independently interesting — lets the audience arrive at the conclusion that your product is the solution. This approach works better for fundraising, hiring, and customer acquisition because it lets the listener feel smart rather than sold to.

What is the Figma narrative strategy for startups?

Figma doesn’t talk about why you should use Figma. They talk about exalting designers — making the user the hero of the story. The product becomes the enabler, not the protagonist. Jay recommends the same structure: present your theses about the problem space, demonstrate genuine understanding, and leave a gap in the narrative that your product naturally fills.

How do you attract engineering talent without recruiting pitches?

Share genuine insights about the technical problems your company is solving. Engineers are drawn to teams that demonstrate deep domain mastery. Jay’s approach at both Codegen and ClickUp was to lead with the thesis — why integrated data makes agents better, why fragmented tools create overhead — and let candidates conclude on their own that this is where interesting work happens.

What is the difference between thought leadership and product pitching?

Product pitching tells the audience what to buy. Thought leadership shares independently interesting observations and frameworks, letting the audience reach their own conclusions. Jay describes the distinction as “saying interesting things that demonstrate a mastery of the topic” versus “laying out a five-part essay that explains this is what the customer should do.”

How do founders practice narrative selling without sounding inauthentic?

Start with beliefs you genuinely hold. Jay emphasizes his theses about integrated information and agent effectiveness because “I legitimately believe everything I’ve just told you.” If your narrative feels inauthentic, the problem isn’t the technique — it’s that you’re trying to construct a narrative around a product you’re not genuinely excited about.

Does the anti-pitch approach work for enterprise sales?

Enterprise buyers, especially high-value ones, do extensive independent research before purchasing. Jay’s experience at ClickUp (serving organizations of 20-2,000 people) confirms that demonstrating domain expertise in public communications attracts the kind of self-directed buyer who becomes a long-term customer, rather than someone who needs heavy sales support.

What type of content should technical founders publish?

Share the underlying theses that led you to build your product. Discuss problems in the space with genuine depth. Point out industry dynamics that others haven’t articulated. Jay describes his approach as presenting “the underlying theses that I have that have led me to the conclusion that this is the winning strategy” — the product comes after the insight.

How can you tell if someone wants to be sold to?

Jay frames it as a red flag: “If somebody wants to be sold to, then it’s kind of a red flag that maybe they’re not the right person you should be talking to.” The best customers, employees, and investors form their own conclusions based on evidence. They want interesting insights and data, not persuasion.

What is the hole-in-the-narrative technique?

Instead of building a complete argument that ends with “therefore, buy our product,” you present interesting observations about the problem space and deliberately leave the conclusion unspoken. The audience fills the gap themselves, arriving at your product as the natural solution. This creates stronger conviction because the conclusion feels like their own insight.

Full episode coming soon

This conversation with Jay Hack is on its way. Check out other episodes in the meantime.

Visit the Channel

More from Jay Hack

Founder Archetype

Read Jay Hack's archetype profile

The Magician · Classical: Hermes · The Return

Related Insights